Every electorate runs a regional checkpoint, distilled from AOTEA‑10T and fine-tuned on local material. Each one is documented the way a minister model is documented: what it was trained on, how it is evaluated here, what it gets wrong, and who remains accountable for it.
The full regional stack runs in ten electorates under the public beta. The remaining checkpoints are deployed and serving opt-in participants; their cards are published as their corpora clear evaluation.
The most common objection to this platform is that it abolishes representation. It does not, and the distinction is worth stating precisely rather than defensively.
Elected, human, removable.
All 71 electorates continue to elect a member of Parliament in the ordinary way. No regional checkpoint stands for election, holds a seat, votes in the House, or can be voted for. The representative function is not in scope for this programme and never has been.
Reading, ranking, matching, drafting.
What the stack replaces is the part of government that reads submissions, ranks waitlists, matches vacancies, schedules capacity and drafts documents. None of that was ever the reason anyone stood for Parliament, and all of it is what currently prevents members from doing the part that was.
The human prevails, in public.
Where a checkpoint’s output and the elected member’s judgement differ, the member prevails and both positions are published in full within twenty-four hours. Fourteen such disagreements have been published across the beta. The member prevailed in all fourteen, which is the only outcome the system permits.